# Inverse systems and inverse limits This post talks about of inverse limits on groups. Inverse limits are subsets of families of algebraic objects (like groups) where nice properties of the building blocks (like groups) continue to hold for the limit object, making it possible to construct quite fiddly structures. We focus on groups for simplicity, but this works for many other structures (compact groups, topological spaces). There is a powerful application in algebraic topology: construction of Cech homology. It's one of the first generalizations of simplicial homology; it strays a bit from Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms (exactness breaks), but it has stronger properties of continuity w.r.t. inverse systems, which make it useful in e.g. fancy game theory. __Definition__. _Directed sets_. Start with a transitive and reflexive relation $\<$ on some set $I$ and require that for all $i,j\in I$ there is $k\in I$ with $i,j\
j$ in $J$. We can prove that following diagram commutes \begin{CD} X_{\varphi(k)} @> \pi^{\varphi(k)\to\varphi(j)} >> X_{\varphi(j)} \\\\ @VV\varphi_kV @VV\varphi_jV \\\\ Y_k @> \tau^{k\to j} >> Y_j \end{CD} __Definition__. _Inverse limits_. Let $(X\_i, \pi^{j\to i})\_{i< j}$ be an inverse system over $I$. Let $\Pi_{i\in I} X\_i$ denote the infinite Cartesian product of groups $X\_i$. The inverse limit of $(X,\pi)$ is defined as $$X\_\infty=\\{x\in \displaystyle\Pi_{i\in I}X\_i\mid x\_i=\pi^{j\to i}(x\_j) \\:\forall i\
\pi_{\varphi(j)} >> X_{\varphi(j)} \\\\ @VVV @VVV \\\\ Y_\infty @> \tau_j >> Y_j \end{CD} __Lemma__. _Limit maps of cofinal systems are isomorphic_. Let $(X, \pi)$ and $(X', \pi')$ be inverse systems over $I$ and $C$ respectively. Let $C$ be cofinal in $I$. Let $\Phi\colon (X,\pi)\to (X',\pi')$ be an inverse map. Let $\varphi\_\infty\colon X\_\infty\to X'\_\infty$ be its limit. Then $\varphi\_\infty$ is an isomorphism. Next, I think I'll write up how this fits in with simplicial homology. There is a nice proof of the fact that on finite polytopes, Cech and simplicial homology groups coincide. This easily leads to topological invariance of simplicial homology, a result that is (in my opinion) a bit trickier to prove using the more classical way of simplicial maps. Of course, simplicial maps are still preferable since they work on infinite polytopes, but oh well hehe.